So after Ms Gifford was shot, Mr Krugman, either parroting or parroted by the left wing echo chamber, decided “violent rhetoric” encouraged and caused the shooting. This turned out to be false in that case although no retraction(s) ever followed.
The f-wit that was involved in yesterday’s shooting on the other hand was more than likely encouraged by violent anti-Trump anti-GOP rhetoric the left is filled with these days.
Bet the silence against rhetoric from that side of the aisle against criticizing themselves for like rhetoric continues unabated.
Note: many others have promoted using the practice of not naming (for the 6 seconds of fame/infamy) shooters is followed here. I will not name him other than as f-wit or another similar derogatory word or phrase.