Apparently in Florida Democrat PACS and large contributors are posting their own pro-Gingrich anti-Romney ads. Two questions. First, do you think that is because the feel Mr Gingrich is a weaker opponent against Mr Obama or is it because they actually prefer him as a possible President. If you thought it was the former, and not the latter, why do you think that supporting a person who you think is less fit for office is your patriotic duty? If you think that it is likely that the answer was the former how do you then explain the lack of objections to this tactics on left leaning blogs?
Hmm. Interesting?- Google Voice Users Can Answer Phone Calls in Hangouts May 22, 2013Gmail users got a taste of Google's new Hangouts feature this week, but it turns out it has a little bit of Gmail's voice calling baked in as well.Read more... […]Whitson Gordon
- A Free Press May 22, 2013Wait. I thought it was racist to criticize Barack Obama. […]Keith Burgess-Jackson
- Myrrh-Bearing Women Sunday, St Mary Magdalene Convent May 22, 2013(ROCOR) - On Sunday, May 21, 2013, the Sunday of the Holy Myrrh-Bearing Women, His Grace Bishop Agapit of Stuttgart celebrated Divine Liturgy (and all-night vigil the evening before) at the Russian St Mary Magdalene, Equal-to-the-Apostles Convent in Gethsemane, Jerusalem. He was joined by Archimandrite Roman (Krassovsky) and other clergymen of the Russian Ec […]Josephus Flavius
- Time Passes Very Slowly May 22, 2013Paul Templar worked as a guide on the Zambezi river near Victoria Falls, and he knew the local hippos: That day I’d taken clients out with three apprentice guides — Mike, Ben and Evans — all in kayaks. We were near the end of the tour, the light was softening and we were taking in […]Isegoria
- Sailor Runs World Record 1.5 Mile, Fails Pushup Portion of Fitness Test May 22, 2013PENSACOLA, FL — A U.S. Navy Sailor who smashed through the world record for the 1.5 mile run Tuesday is being discharged from the military for failing to maintain physical fitness standards, officials said. His run record was one part of a bi-annual fitness exam mandated by the Navy called the Physical Readiness Test (PRT). With […]NavyFork
- Obama Adviser Realizes that the Size of Government Matters After All May 21, 2013(Ilya Somin) In his first Inaugural Address, President Obama famously said that we should not ask “whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works.” I criticized this indifference to the size of government in one of my very first posts of the Obama Presidency. More recently, however, longtime Obama adviser David Axelrod recognized that t […]Ilya Somin
- Obama's Kulturkampf May 21, 2013http://www.patheos.com/blogs/geneveith/2013/05/irs-also-targeted-religious-groups/ […]steve
- Jack Dunphy : If the Obama Administration Ran Your Local Police Department May 21, 2013Transcript from dispatch center:911 Operator: 9-1-1, what is your emergency?Caller: Iâm calling from 1324 Elm Street. Iâm upstairs hiding in a closet, and some men with guns just broke in downstairs and theyâre robbing my family.Operator: Hmmm. 1324 Elm Street. I donât think we have anyone in that area.Caller: What?Operator: Well, thatâs pretty far […]Jack Dunphy
- The Air Travel Rights You Aren't Aware Of (and How to Get Them) May 21, 2013If you've ever sat in a plane on the tarmac only to have the flight cancelled, been bumped just before boarding, or landed at your destination only to be told your luggage will arrive sometime in the next 12 hours, you know how air travel can suck. In all of those cases, the airline owes you for your trouble. Sometimes it's good customer service, a […]Alan Henry
- Guns Using Cased, Telescoped Ammunition May 21, 2013AAI Corp continues to develop caseless, telescoped ammunition and machine guns to fire it under the United States Joint Service Small Arms Research Program Office’s (JSSAP) Lightweight Small Arms Technologies (LSAT) program. The caseless, telescoped ammo and gun developed by AAI under this program, was first mentioned at The Firearm Blog in 2010. In a paral […]Richard Johnson
- John Yoo : Lots of Partisanship, No Adult Supervision May 20, 2013The unfolding of the Obama Administration's aggressive attitude towards the media continues to reveal the same sorry themes as the other scandals erupting inside the Beltway. The first is partisanship. This weekend came news that the Justice Department conducted an invasive investigation into the daily activities of Fox News reporter James Rosen, to the […]John Yoo
- Lingo the Clown May 20, 2013textastrophe: […](author unknown)
- A Tough Beat May 20, 2013Anthony Daniels, who also writes under the name Theodore Dalrymple, has for years told us about Britain’s underclass. He observed it up close as a prison psychiatrist. One of the things he often ran into, in broader society, was disbelief: Lords and ladies and so on would simply not believe that what Daniels was describing took place. Which brings me to Roge […]Jay Nordlinger
- Matthew Hennessey : More Smoke than Fire: Some Informal Climate Math May 20, 2013One of the environmental leftâs favorite pictures to paint is of North America as a pristine ecological paradise prior to the industrial revolution of the 19th century. Often, the most hysterical headlines about climate change employ alarming phrases such as âFor the first time in human history!â and âNever before seen levels!â and âAll-time high […]Matthew Hennessey
- Secret thoughts of creative professionals May 20, 2013From Matt Groening back in the day… (via Biblioklept, This Isn’t Happiness) […]Abraham
- Google Voice Users Can Answer Phone Calls in Hangouts May 22, 2013
I believe all of the serious money going for Gingrich is money that actually likes Gingrich.
As for the ethics of supporting someone only because you think it might increase the odds of the party losing in the general election. It probably is ethical. Just imagine the Evil Party(tm) has two people running in the primary. The first is a reincarnated Adolf Hitler….gone is the funny facial hair, he looks like a chisled Ken Doll and has great appeal to the general public. The other is the anti-Christ, but he appears as fat, unattractive, just totally unattractive to the general public.
You deem that if Hitler wins, he will kill 60% of humanity, the anti-christ 90%. So clearly Hitler in this case is ‘more fit’ than the anti-christ. In this case though supporting the anti-Christ works because it ensures Obama wins and no one gets slaughtered.
The game theory here is complicated by the fact that the general voter is incorporating not only who he thinks is better but the fact that it’s a two stage race where you can’t be in the general election without first winning the primary.
Boonton,
A million dollars in Florida seems serious. You think Obama PACs “likes” Gingrich qua Gingrich? Seriously? Naive much.
I know the simple game theory that this is a two stage race in which one part is only participating (this year) in one stage. I’m asking about the morality of gaming and trying to throw the other sides race (which arguably you have no right to participate in if you are of the other party) for a person who if he wins the final stage would be worse … Or to put in perspective of your example. When the A/C wins the general election, you having decided to campaign against the less bad but more electable A/H, how do you justify your support for the candidate you felt was a poorer choice, some complicated game theory thing.
Why isn’t the simpler game, we want each party to have the candidate best fit to be President in the general election not what is ultimately better for the country? And that not working for that alternative is not ethical.
I think you’re overestimating the Democratic potential in Gingrich’s surge. I suggest you look at Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, casino mogul billionaire who have made the largest political donation in history, $15M, to Gingrich and it seems they did so because, well they like Gingrich. I suppose $100K here or there may be from some game theory playing Dems but I don’t think it’s relevant here. (see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/newt-gingrich-sheldon-adelson-super-pac-citizens-united_n_1233372.html)
Onto the theory side:
I’m asking about the morality of gaming and trying to throw the other sides race (which arguably you have no right to participate in if you are of the other party) for a person who if he wins the final stage would be worse
Consider my hypothetical where the anti-christ is objectively the worse candidate of all to win the overall election but winning the nomination ensures 60% of humanity won’t be killed by Hitler winning the general election. It seems both rational and ethical to play the game.
As for ‘no right to participate’…not sure what you’re talking about. Your side fought tooth and nail to gut campaign finance regulation on the grounds that money = speech. All dirty tricks are now acceptable by your philosophy.I think you’re overestimating the Democratic potential in Gingrich’s surge. I suggest you look at Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, casino mogul billionaire who have made the largest political donation in history, $15M, to Gingrich and it seems they did so because, well they like Gingrich. I suppose $100K here or there may be from some game theory playing Dems but I don’t think it’s relevant here. (see http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/26/newt-gingrich-sheldon-adelson-super-pac-citizens-united_n_1233372.html)
Onto the theory side:
I’m asking about the morality of gaming and trying to throw the other sides race (which arguably you have no right to participate in if you are of the other party) for a person who if he wins the final stage would be worse
Consider my hypothetical where the anti-christ is objectively the worse candidate of all to win the overall election but winning the nomination ensures 60% of humanity won’t be killed by Hitler winning the general election. It seems both rational and ethical to play the game.
As for ‘no right to participate’…not sure what you’re talking about. Your side fought tooth and nail to gut campaign finance regulation on the grounds that money = speech. All dirty tricks are now acceptable by your philosophy.
Why isn’t the simpler game, we want each party to have the candidate best fit to be President in the general election not what is ultimately better for the country? And that not working for that alternative is not ethical.
Well clearly in the case I presented that doesn’t have to be the case as the hypothetical demonstrates. So the problem doesn’t seem to be how people play the game but the rules of the game itself.
Maybe a solution would be to follow something like NYC. There you have at least 4 parties (Dems, Reps, but also Progressive and Conservative Party). Often a politican may run with multiple endorsements (for example, Republican and Conservative). The number of votes determine the winner but the votes under party banners decide things like the party’s placement on the ballot in the next election.
There if a Republican isn’t quite conservative enough, the Conservative Party may have a different person on their line and vice versa. In that model, it would be easier to have multiple people making serious bids in the ultimate election.