I’ll start by collecting my thoughts. I promised a commenter (Mr
Larson) a essay on Just War. I am not ready yet form a coherent essay,
but I thought in preparation I’d jot down a few thoughts while I get
organized, and perhaps elicit a few comments in the meantime. As I
ponder this topic I realize it is a much bigger topic than the typical
blog post, although I don’t either count my “words” nor tend to write
particularly short essays. So here’s my plan. Today, I’m just going to
bang a lot of short points out. Then tomorrow, I’ll look at it and
decide how I need to organize my thoughts and plan the layout of the
“rest” of the posts on this topic. Then, I’ll get down to work and
start banging them out. So, on to random thoughts:
theory on just war makes a good starting point. It is concise, to the
point and can be applied to many situations. It also has the added
benefit, from my particular political persuasion, of being easily
applied to the current Iraq war and reconstruction and justifying those
actions. On the other hand, I don’t think it does apply very
well to the Revolutionary War, which I would tend to also support. Or
to restate, if Aquinas theory is taken as correct, a War may be
un-Just, but still gain my personal support which makes no sense so I
may have to revise my opinion of Just War. Aquinas theory take three
some of the other theories of war I’ve recently encountered find it
hard to justify acting against Germany for example in World War II
while at the same time describing the Iraq war as unjustified (these
justifications also tend to ignore the fact that technically we were
not at peace with Iraq when commencing with the 2nd Iraq offensive).
my current understanding, having never read the actual charter, the UN
is a malformed organization. As I’ve stated before, when we as citizens
enter into social contract to form a state, we give up some of our
individual rights for our collective good. The nation states in forming
the UN wanted to have their cake and eat it too. They formed a UN,
pretend that it has authority, but also state emphatically that they
are not giving up any individual rights to that organization.
Because they did not give up those rights, the existence of the UN is
something of a collective fiction. To be honest, with the fact that
perhaps a majority of the states which belong to the UN represent
individuals holding sway over repressive regimes, that is probably a
Well, the UN is a multinational organization which is in conception is
supposed to regulate and legitimize such actions. The ethical/moral
status of the UN does enter in as a factor in that regard. To whit, as
currently constructed can the UN legitimately play a role in
determining whether a war is just or not.
for Just War depend somewhat crucially on the motivations of the
“leader”. In this case, that would be the Senate for Presidents do not
have the authority to declare war. How do we determine such a thing?
which I will use in my future considerations on Just War. I won’t
comment on just/unjust today I have a strong opinion.
agree with C.S. Lewis that the position of the complete pacifist is not
tenable. War is “hell” as they say, but it is not always the worst
alternative. While I may turn my “other cheek” it is a different thing
entirely to turn my child’s cheek.
with YHWH prior to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis is
a political lesson about the death of innocents sometimes being
required for a greater good to be accomplished.