Noting A Dim Observation

Mr Sullivan redefines stupid today, via The Daily Dish regarding Ms Malkin:

She won’t vote for McCain – even against Clinton.

Imagine that. Imagine that voters prioritize issues as they see fit (columnists included). Golly.

This is allowed and perhaps even expected, but perhaps not by Mr Sullivan it seems. Why is this a suprise? For Ms Malkin it seems immigration is key. Not a big surprise at a casual perusal of her blog.

Posted in Short Thoughts, Visiting, stupid questions.

2 comments

By Mark – January 31, 2008

2 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

JewishAtheist says

I don’t get it. You’re saying Sullivan is stupid because he didn’t expect Malkin to vote for Clinton over McCain?

January 31, 2008, 15:33
Mark says

JA,
I’m calling him dumb because he’s basically (“her head blew up”) deriding her for not seeing things the way he does.

January 31, 2008, 15:41

« Thursday Highlights Holiness and the Progressives »

Super Bowl Thoughts III February 9, 2010
I guess I'm going to turn this into an annual tradition, writing about the Super Bowl. I'm even getting all pretentious about it and marking them with Roman numerals, just as the NFL does. So sue me. First off, it was a terrific game. Congrats to the New Orleans Saints, a true Cinderella story of a team that seemed a perpetual cellar dweller that c […]
Tom Neven
Miraculous Healing, Exhibit A: Me (or "The Reason I Fasted") February 9, 2010
I have Multiple Sclerosis, and have had it for a bit over 23 years. The first episode I had numbed the left half of my body from the shoulder to the foot. With medication it went almost entirely away, with just some slight lingering numbness in my left hand that I could handle. Other smaller episodes of it coming and going occurred for some years after th […]
Doug Payton
Introduction to Paul Tillich's Existential Ontology (God as Being Itself) February 9, 2010
This will be in several parts, an introduction and a couple of explaintory installments then some arguments.Paul Tillich (1866-1965) was one of the most influential Christian theologians of the twentieth century. Tillich spoke to the times. He was painfully aware of the collapse of modernity (the beginning of which he traced from the enlightenment), and trie […]
Metacrock
Not Human Rights February 9, 2010
My son (the student, not the soldier) sent me this link, and tells me I should quote Ben Dror Yemini more often than I do. Yemini is a Tel-Aviv lawyer turned centrist pundit with a sharp pen and a regular column in Maariv. The problem is, he writes Hebrew, and even when he gets translated (here's an archive of his translated articles), much of his argum […]
Yaacov
The Development Of The Canon (Part 3) February 9, 2010
Dave Armstrong writes:At the Council of Nicaea, according to Protestant apologist Norman Geisler (How we Got the Bible, with co-author William E. Nix, Chicago: Moody Press, 1974, 109), the books of James, 2 Peter, 2 and 3 John, and Jude, were "named as disputed." Geisler seems, however (based on his comments on p. 111), to merely be talking about t […]
Jason Engwer
Hacking for Fun and Profit in China’s Underworld February 9, 2010
A young hacker let a reporter into his world of trolling for information that may one day be worth money. […]
By DAVID BARBOZA
Recasting Avatar February 9, 2010
The VC has already brought attention to one property rights interpretation of a tale generally thought to be left-leaning (The Lorax). Today, Ilya Somin points to another example of the genre: David Boaz on Avatar: Conservatives have been very critical of the Golden Globe-winning film “Avatar” for its mystical melange of trite leftist themes. But what they h […]
David Schraub