Good morning.
- A book reviewed on theodicy at Chrisendom.
- The cult of personality at That Strange Feeling.
- On the Ukraine elections at Publius Pundit. More here at Neeka’s backlog.
- Allegations of genocidal horror reported by Elizabeth Wong.
- A debate noted by Steven Harris.
- Siris on charity and disparate income.
- Jonathan at the Chicago Boyz with a quote on Ahmadinejad’s visit and speech.
- A quote as well from Adrian on sin.
- Whew!
- Church and the
mixingblending bowl at The Fire and the Rose. - Post (Positive Liberty) and rebut (Siris). Reply? Rejoinder?
- The impossibility of neutrality (on abortion) at One Eternal Day.
- A poem on the
watchers of televisioneaters of lotus at biblicalia. - Weirdness noted of a marital sort at Wittenburg Gate.











































The impossibility of neutrality (on abortion) at One Eternal Day.
If one believes it’s murder, one can’t be neutral. However, most people don’t believe this. This is true of even many who claim they believe it, because when pressed, they would never support charging the woman with murder. Most people also don’t grieve a miscarriage as they would a baby.
Finally, whether a fetus has the moral status of a person is not, as the blogger claims, a factual question.
JA,
I hope you realize that your answer is not “neutral”.
Huh? What answer?
JA,
Sorry. Your remark.