Is it odd (or not) that those who complain (now) most bitterly about the ineffectiveness and screwups in government, e.g., Iraq, Katrina, and the list goes on, are also the very same people who think single-payer/government controlled health-care is a good idea. Does that really make any sense?
Find It!
Conversation
- Boonton on Monday Highlights
- Mark on Monday Highlights
- JewishAtheist on Monday Highlights
- Boonton on Wednesday Highlights
- Boonton on Monday Highlights
- Mark on Monday Highlights
- JewishAtheist on Monday Highlights
- Boonton on Monday Highlights
- Boonton on Monday Highlights
- Mark on Monday Highlights
Hmm. Interesting?
- Aereo puts TV antennas in the cloud, streams OTA broadcasts on the internet February 14, 2012We've all heard about SlingBox, that nifty bit of kit that lets you stream your cable or satellite television to the mobile device of your choice, and now a new company called Aereo aims to provide a similar service for OTA broadcast television. The service costs $12 dollars a month and will launch March 14th, but is only available to folks in New York […]Michael Gorman
- Biolibertarianism? February 14, 2012Although Aaron Powell seems to have taken a break from getting his ass handed to him by yours truly (see 1, 2), his readers and I have been having a lively conversation about what libertarianism is (unsurprisingly, there's been some disagreement on that topic) and why it is (supposedly) superior to other political philosophies. While I intend on summari […]Eli Horowitz
- Homeland Security takes on The Carrington Event February 14, 2012While we worry about future threats like global warming, and present threats like Iran’s escalating nuclear program, the sun’s propensity for belching out monstrous solar flares (like the Carrington event of 1859) could almost instantly create a world without modern … Continue reading → […]Anthony Watts
- Figure Out Which Oils to Use for Your Cooking Needs with The Cooking Oil Comparison Chart [Cooking] February 14, 2012There are so many cooking oils to choose from—some supposedly healthier than others, some better for cooking at high heat and others better used as dressings—that knowing which oils to use and when can be confusing. This chart tells you at a glance what you need to know about cooking oils. More » […]Melanie Pinola
- Smoky the Bear’s warning for those expressing their love February 14, 2012(via College Humor) […]Abraham Piper
- The Art Imbroglio, Cont. February 14, 2012The League managed to turn a discussion about High vs. Low Art into a discussion about Conservative vs. Liberal Art over the last few days… I wonder if I’m the only one that noticed something there… and I’d like to take a moment to quote Tod, again, from his last post: Rather, they are penned by writers that succeed in painting with words the human experienc […]Patrick Cahalan
- A gold puzzle February 14, 2012I CAN think of only two good reasons gold is valuable: it’s shiny and scarce. I reckon its popularity is a relic of the gold standard. If you think about it, other than shininess and scarcity, nothing makes gold intrinsically more valuable than dollars. My colleague recently pointed us to Warren Buffet’s take on gold. He favours stocks or real estate because […](author unknown)
- THE DAWN OF RECORDED SOUND IN AMERICA. February 13, 2012The Smithsonian has hundreds of the earliest audio recordings ever made, but they have been considered unplayable and nobody knew what was on them. Recently, the Library of Congress and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory collaborated to make optical scanners capable of recording the patterns, and some of the results are becoming available. You can get a b […]languagehat
- Save Money and Get a Better Drink with the Secret Short Cappuccino at Starbucks [Coffee] February 11, 2012According to news weblog Slate, Starbucks can serve you a better, stronger cappuccino that costs less money; the baristas all know about it, but it's not on any menu. We're talking about the Starbucks short cappuccino, and if you're going to visit the Seattle-based coffee megacorporation you may want to give it a try. More » […]David Galloway
- Jason Mraz, Al Gore's new friend February 11, 2012Jason Mraz is an American singer and songwriter. The music isn't quite my cup of tea but I think it's good. This YouTube video with his song (which I've heard before) has attracted 120 million viewers: that's quite something. I don't remember seeing a number over 100 million for quite some time if ever. The musician who grew up in Qu […]Luboš Motl
- Cottingham, Wittgenstein, and the Religious Impulse February 10, 2012John Cottingham, On the Meaning of Life (Routledge 2003), p. 52: . . . the whole of the religious impulse arises from the profound sense we have of a gap between how we are and how we would wish to be . . . .This is not quite right, as it seems to me, even if '"would wish to be" is read as "ought to be." The sense of th […]Bill Vallicella
- Skin Cancer Drug Reverses Alzheimer's Symptoms In Mice February 10, 2012An anonymous reader writes "A skin cancer drug may rapidly reverse pathological, cognitive and memory deterioration associated with Alzheimer's disease, according to new research published on Thursday. Bexarotene, a drug that is currently used to combat T cell lymphoma, appeared to reverse plaque buildup and improve memory in the brains of mice wit […]timothy
- What would the end of football look like? February 10, 2012Kevin Grier and I have a new piece up on Grantland, on that topic. It is perhaps hard to excerpt, but here is the close of the piece: Another winner would be track and field. Future Rob Gronkowskis in the decathalon? Future Jerome Simpsons in the high jump? World records would fall at a rapid pace. This outcome may sound ridiculous, but the collapse of foot […]Tyler Cowen
- Teaching Calculus with O-Notation February 10, 2012I was musing the other day on whether it would be easier to teach calculus using O notation. Coincidentally, today I just came across a posted by Alexandre Borovik quoting a letter that Donald Knuth wrote to the Notices of the AMS in 1988 advocating exactly that. […]Walt
- Miracles of Authority February 10, 2012When abused, authority damages bodies. A husband punches his wife and breaks her nose. Abusive day care workers crush the bones, dislocate the limbs, and scar the souls of small children. Tyrants torture bodies into a quivering mess. Even when the results are not so extreme, abusive authority disables bodies. A husband who never lays an aggressive finger on […]ft@firsthings.com (Peter J. Leithart )











































WTF? Katrina and Iraq were not “government’s” fault, they were Bush’s (and maybe the Louisana folks too, to be fair.) There is not one chance in a hundred that Al Gore would have started this war and the problem in Louisana was not too much government, but too little.
It’s like (the conservative) P.J. O’Rourke said, “Republicans are the party that says government doesn’t work, and then get elected and prove it.” Kind of makes sense, considering the contempt they have for it.
JA,
Is the tint to your glasses that make you imagine that government incompetency is limited to the GOP (and specifically Bush). Clinton and Mogadishu/Blackhawk Down, Carter and the hostage rescue? I could go into more, but the notion that government incompetency is partisan is, well, I think both wrong and perhaps how you get the idea that government health care is a good idea. But how will you insure that when you put such a plan in place that henceforth only “competent” individuals get elected? Whence comes your confidence?
Bush is uncommonly incompetent for a president, but that’s not even the point here.
Although no government is perfect, there are some situations where it is a better choice to run things than the private sector is, generally when the needs of the people do not align neatly with turning a profit. Would Iraq have worked out better if the army were privatized and Bush were a private CEO in charge? No, he would be “staying the course” until he ran out of money. Would New Orleans have been better off if it were a tiny branch office of Bush, Inc.? No, he would have found it fiscally prudent to just cut them off and provide even less aid than he did.
JA,
On the first paragraph, … exactly.
If a private organization where in the business of providing (for profit) rescue and recovery for cities due to natural disaster then I don’t think it would have been fiscally prudent (if not a monopoly like the government is in this case) to just “cut them off” for … they’d lose all their other clients and then be out of business.
In general actually, I think the government should be constitutionally forbidden from entering into the actuarial/insurance type ventures because the incentives are all wrong. The incentive for the politician is to push the payment on the future for votes in the present, whereas a profit seeking organization wants to continue to exist so they can’t (sanely) push payment off in the same way, as they hope to make money both now and in the next decade. That is why, Health care (and retirement) as well as disaster insurance (as evidenced by the civil engineering faults and preparedness problems in New Orleans) should all be taken out of the governments hands.
If a private organization where in the business of providing (for profit) rescue and recovery for cities due to natural disaster then I don’t think it would have been fiscally prudent (if not a monopoly like the government is in this case) to just “cut them off” for … they’d lose all their other clients and then be out of business.
But isn’t that exactly what private insurance companies did (or tried to do) to New Orleans residents after Katrina?
The incentive for the politician is to push the payment on the future for votes in the present, whereas a profit seeking organization wants to continue to exist so they can’t (sanely) push payment off in the same way
Government at least has an incentive to provide health care to all, while corporations have an incentive to deny as many claims as it can possibly get away with. The answer doesn’t lie solely with government or solely with corporations, but with a mixture. Corporations to keep things running well, and government to guarantee that people don’t get screwed. When corporations aren’t adequately regulated, they happily externalize all costs so that they rake in the profits while the rest of us pay the bills.