Skip to content

Morning Highlights

Good morning.

  • A NPR sponsored climate debate which demonstrated a shift in perception in their audience. The question debated was whether climate change is a crisis. Initially the audience indicated a strong preference for the idea that it was in crisis. After the debate, the reverese. Transcript can be found here. (HT: The Reference Frame). What do you think after reading the transcript?
  • David Wayne at Jollyblogger on jargon in chuch and the outsider.
  • Reading and hermeneutics (jargon?) at Jesus Creed by Scot McNight. What you read and what you hear is not the same as what was intended. Consequences?
  • Does it make sense for the work to get you down … if you’re a preacher? John Schroeder considers at Blogotional.

Posted in Link Roundup.

2 comments

By Mark – March 19, 2007

2 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. JewishAtheist says

    I think jargon sometimes makes it difficult for me to understand what you’re saying.

    March 19, 2007, 09:31

Continuing the Discussion

  1. The Evangelical Ecologist linked to this post on March 26, 2007

    of people: Afterward, about 46 percent agreed with the motion, roughly 42 percent were opposed and about 12 percent were undecided. [MP3 from NPR (50 minutes, shortened and with summaries by an NPR host); Full debate (92 minutes); Transcript] (HT: Pseudo-Polymath) the post I wrote a year ago (reprised below) seemed still current. Particularly the stuff from National Geographic. *** The National Association of Evangelicals is doing the adult thing where global warming is concerned:



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.

« »