Skip to content


Friday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. A book reviewed.
  2. VAT considered. The bigger problem with VAT is that the Congress critters considering VAT aren’t thinking of it as a replacement but an addition.
  3. A book list.
  4. Clunkers. A bad idea then, worse in retrospect.
  5. Oil in them thar hills.
  6. What airline I wonder?
  7. Beslan.
  8. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
  9. Weather is not climate. Climate is not climate
  10. The Administration and yet-another-broken-promise.
  11. Another look at unemployment numbers
  12. Prayer as image.
  13. The Discovery nut as right winger meme.
  14. Statistics and schools. 

Posted in Link Roundup.


Thursday Highlights

Good morning. Well, I’m a little rushed this morning … shorter list than usual … work intrudes on life.

  1. Satan and cinema.
  2. Another view of the POTUS speech. I think the right was not his intended audience. I’m not sure who was.
  3. Thoughts on marriage, mostly from the left. I’d offer that if you’re considering marriage and want to pretend to live the self-examined life, this resource is indispensable (Wing to Wing, Oar to Oar).
  4. Ahhhhh
  5. Occupied territory.
  6. Why is this even a question
  7. Thought and sin.
  8. Liberal caricature.
  9. Comments of note.
  10. Of rest and restlessness.
  11. Noetic processes.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Wednesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Son of a great man.
  2. On the POTUS address.
  3. Verse.
  4. Huh, the average male has a GPS these days.
  5. France and the Roma.
  6. Hmm, in a search for a less substantial less vapid political post … this might be in the list. My wife lists here occupation on our 10-40 as “domestic goddess.” 
  7. Male midlife crisis … a temporary one.
  8. Mr Assange.
  9. About those free riders.
  10. I think that assessment is right, although I doubt my own ability to judge the motives of liberal/progressives.

Posted in Link Roundup.


When You Joust …

Don’t aim for the straw man, go for the flesh and blood one aiming a lance at you. Continued…

Posted in Christian Philosophy, Christianity.


Tuesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Of Beck and Obama.
  2. A man shot and consequence.
  3. Two Gulf disasters, two Presidents, and a cricket race.
  4. One post which clearly shows Mr Krugman and his ilk are non-serious about economy and politics.
  5. And lo and behold, he shows the origins of his fantasy.
  6. A big bubble?
  7. The continuation of the lying to Congress charge … one wonders how actual real-live you-can-tell-they’re-lying-because-their-lips-are-moving Congress-critters make such charges with straight faces.
  8. Appeasement.
  9. A challenge.
  10. Just get on your bike and ride, dude.
  11. Shotgun tracts.
  12. Contra smut.

Posted in Link Roundup.


On Park51 or the Cordoba House

I have not offered any opinion of mine own on the proposed Mosque site. I think a lot of odd things have been said about it, not the least of which was the GOP reaction to his expressing the mainstream conservative opinion on the matter, that they do in fact posses a Constitutional right to build but that it is a very bad idea. One has to remember an idea you support, when spoken by one on the other side of the aisle, remains a good idea (and recall that even a broken clock is right twice a day). Another silly thing touted is that this building is “two whole blocks away” and nowhere near the ‘Ground Zero’ location. The reason that notion is silly is that the Park51/Cordoba people have chosen this location is its proximity to the former World Trade site. It seems to me that the those who protest that this is too far away miss a crucial point. Neither the sponsors nor the objectors see that is correct. Doubtless one can point at countless other ideas fronted on this topic which are incoherent or silly. Continued…

Posted in Policy, Short Thoughts.


Monday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Some with Nixie tubes
  2. The VP and those pesky details.
  3. Going up?
  4. Setting aside the (excessive) sarcasm, I think the question of how to treat differently talented kids in school to optimize goals is a valid question. And “making things equal” is not necessarily the best answer.
  5. Stupid liberal tricks … now bullets.
  6. That’s what we need more, bigger deficits.
  7. Extreme airport.
  8. Friendship.
  9. Mr Obama goes on the offensive against misinformation, with hyperbole and misinformation.
  10. Great photo anyhow.
  11. Reading on the Mosque
  12. 2-d time.
  13. Iraq.
  14. A photo.
  15. Norman and virtue.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Friday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Church and state and Turkey.
  2. Market in Poland, a photo-essay.
  3. Vindictiveness and the Admin.
  4. On that hard pullout date and strategy.
  5. More on Park51.
  6. A conservative surprised at epistemic closure from the left.
  7. I have yet to see mention of this from the left. Odd that. And this is spot on … the concept of hate crimes are an outrage.
  8. Somebody somewhere didn’t like Wall-E.
  9. Fun with banks.
  10. 100 years, and some shared thoughts.
  11. Bike tech lust.
  12. Weight loss tips that beat licking raw eggs all hollow.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Weeee!!!!

Well, I’ve made transition from occasionally (3-4 times a week) riding in the basement (in the summer!? what was I thinking) to commuting again. And boy oh boy I didn’t realize how much I missed riding outside and, alas, didn’t realize how badly out of shape I’d gotten. The only blessing about being out of shape so badly is how easy it is too improve. I started commuting on Monday night and already by Thursday the rollers take less starch out of my legs. I still get gassed way to easily and can’t just keep it in the big ring and spark up a a hill of any length. The most positive note from today was how tired my legs were feeling during the afternoon, but 10 minutes into my ride home that tiredness was barely a memory. 

 

Posted in Cycling, Training.


Thursday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Divination.
  2. For those that need a Bastiat clobbering.
  3. An economically well modeled computer game played (HT: CT).
  4. Talking beer.
  5. More on the Koyzis essay I wrote about last night … for my reading it seems that what is presented as Koyzis ‘reading” of Mills is better than Mr Nivens. 
  6. The jam ends, the cause … regulation?
  7. H-Fit?
  8. Our President in a nutshell.
  9. Firestorm.
  10. Criticism of the right from the right.
  11. Sex and the single life.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Sing of Liberty

David Koyzis has been writing about oppression, here and here.

Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Declaration that the purpose of government is to preserve and protect Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. While it is pretty clear what Life meant, and that Happiness for Jefferson ran along Aristotelean lines, which is to say along the lines of something like eudemonia. But Liberty … now there is a tricky word. In colonial America, historian David Hackett Fischer in a book everyone should read (or at least have as a reference) Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America (America: a Cultural History), identifies four folkways or distinct communities in colonial America. These folkways had very different about almost every aspect of life but in particular they all had distinct and non-overlapping ideas of what the word Liberty meant. Alas, while I say (and really think) this is a great reference book it turns out my copy is at work … and not here at home where I’m writing this so some of this is going to be from memory. Continued…

Posted in Disengenuity, Ethics.


A Quick Book Resource Bleg

As I’ve noted before, I’m of the opinion that evolution is a scientific discipline so far in its infancy and as such is not particularly interesting. And it isn’t relevant at this point to rehash my particular quibbles with it especially as regards the “ID/Darwin” debate.

But I’ve a question about speciation and differentiation that perhaps someone out there can point me to a resource to clear my question up. Species can clearly have descendant relatives with a different number of chromosomes. Chromosome numbers changes are genetic transcription errors occur (euploidy). But transcription errors of this sort are a thing which occurs to an individual and are accidental and rare. Speciation is something which happens to a population. How does one get from the one to the other? 

Is there an Internet account describing this … or a book?

Posted in stupid questions.


Wednesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Blogs and peer review.
  2. Yes, a tax cut is not a payment.
  3. Someday it will occur to someone on the left, that there are two ways to attack the deficit by cutting spending or raising taxes, alas not today however.
  4. I can’t even imagine how to spend money like that, do they burn it?
  5. Stony Ithaca, a place to set my head?
  6. A repulsive thing.
  7. From the “I can’t imagine any need for secrecy in wartime” department.
  8. Housing.
  9. 25%!!! Amazing. A cultural divide if there ever was one.
  10. Hope and change transform.
  11. Books read and micro-reviews supplied.
  12. As life imitates Airplane.
  13. On war, which theory of war posits that making public a “I’m quitting and going home” date as a having any strategic value?

Posted in Link Roundup.


Adulthood and Free Will

Brandon on that very serious blog, Siris (a spelling mistake I made long long ago) offered this interesting post some time ago. I had linked it with the intent of writing a little later, and later finally has arrive. That post as well, links back to this one originally, which expands the argument posed by Brandon a little and (twice) offers that quantum mechanics has not had anything to say about determinism. I think that’s wrong, and the paper by one of my favorite mathematicians (Conway) which I blogged a bit about demonstrates the case that Physics offers regarding determinism. But … to the main point, I think this misses an essential point which might be termed the divide between childhood and adulthood. 

Strawson’s argument in brief attempts is:

(a) It’s undeniable that the way you are initially is a result of your genetic inheritance and early experience.

(b) It’s undeniable that these are things for which you can’t be held to be in any way responsible (morally or otherwise).

(c) But you can’t at any later stage of life hope to acquire true or ultimate moral responsibility for the way you are by trying to change the way you already are as a result of genetic inheritance and previous experience.

(d) Why not? Because both the particular ways in which you try to change yourself, and the amount of success you have when trying to change yourself, will be determined by how you already are as a result of your genetic inheritance and previous experience.

(e) And any further changes that you may become able to bring about after you have brought about certain initial changes will in turn be determined, via the initial changes, by your genetic inheritance and previous experience.

I offer the following rejoinder, without denying the premise or argument the conclusion is wrong. That is to say it is only true if you are a child and choose to remain a child. 

Adulthood comes when we accept the cards we are dealt as belonging to ourself and assuming that responsibility for those cards. One stakes the claim that your actions are in fact yours, for better or worse. Fate, the devil (made me do it, upbringing or genetics …. all fall into the same bin. Your words and actions are yours. By accepting that as a premise you put away childish ways. 

Posted in Ethics.


Of Models of Liability

I am informed, over and over, as it turns out about “strict liability.” Liability laws in this country, for whatever reason, irk me. More below the fold.  Continued…

Posted in Ethics.


Tuesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Upcharge for extra mass.
  2. Cinema.
  3. Low church and liturgy.
  4. A the Quantum people attack back.
  5. We are more alike than different.
  6. Traffic.
  7. A good word for Mr Carter.
  8. Not me.
  9. Heh.
  10. He knew that, but didn’t seem fit to mention that the failures were basically all on the government side (especially when you recall the safety equipment is by government mandate).
  11. Suffering for art’s sake.
  12. The state of Mr Obama’s buddies state.
  13. The professional left.
  14. Goin’ green … is clearly more fun if you’re a wealthy professional humorist.
  15. The Cato purge apparently wasn’t.

I had this joke I was going to try to tell about how now that I’m back biking a lot more regularly but have a new puppy, we have this symbiotic relationship. She licks the sweat of me after a ride reaping salt … and I don’t have to take showers anymore. But I decided not to tell it, aren’t y’all grateful? ;)

Posted in Link Roundup.


Monday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. A word, Eurosclerosis … used … and stimulus measurement. Why oh why is there spending out to 2015?
  2. A non-story begins … and ends
  3. The despicable left.
  4. More stupid liberal tricks here … and for measure more ways to curb your freedom.
  5. On ethnicity and church.
  6. Tanks for the memories.
  7. Ten maxims of advice for prayer.
  8. Jokes from the CBO.
  9. The mosque kerfuffle and cognitive bias.
  10. St. Nicholas … a before picture.
  11. Testing QM.
  12. Duh.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Fever Dreams

Well, besides the fact that I have two other interesting ideas in the hopper, this notion occurred to me and I thought I’d get it down before I forget.

This question is admittedly in the context of the BP/Gulf spill, but I want (on the outset) to make it clear that I am making no allegation here. I have no factual basis or even hearsay reports which would back up my question. But … the problem is, is that if my question has merit, there wouldn’t be would there?

Let me begin with a legal question about liability. 

Say I’m doing a particular activity, and am following the legal restrictions and regulations regarding that practice. But, what I don’t realize is that by following the legal regulations disaster is inevitable. That is I’m in a catch-22 situation, if I fail to do as required I break the law, if I do follow the law then a disaster occurs. Suppose “not doing” this thing is not really feasible. As an aside, I might mention it is for this reason that I think that regulatory approval should indemnify a company which follows said regulations from liability. 

But my question here doesn’t hinge on legal question but political ones. If the disaster that occurs turns out to loom large on the public stage then an investigation is undoubtedly going to follow. This investigation is going to closely tied with those same people and parts of the government which put the regulations in place which both led to the disaster and which were the responsibility of that same said part/party of the government.

So, here’s the question: How likely is the government culpability going to come out investigation? Will that side of it get a fair hearing? And furthermore, is it necessarily in the interest of the injured party to blame the government regulator when their livelihood depends on a working relationship with that same party? 

Consider the BP/Gulf disaster directly here. BP and all the Gulf oil contractors and drillers are required to use government provided survey and risk models in their business. How and what manner of safety devices are regulated by law, you can’t use something different or better, e.g., you have to use the mandated “cutoff valves” as specified. So it seems a big culprit in this story will be, as in the Challenger disaster, a failure in government run QC/QA practices. At the same time, I’m guessing it’s not in BPs interest in the long run to fight to have the blame correctly assigned with the feds as they (and everyone in their industry) has to work with the feds to get anything done. So, the government (especially in our semi-continual election season) will not want to be blamed. BP will not fight getting blamed. So, even if BP/Deepwater ultimately is not the true culprit here, they will in fact be made the fall guys. 

Posted in Disengenuity.


Friday Highlights

Good morning. So … my eldest daughter gets her drivers permit today. Tempus fugit, eh?

  1. Iraq.
  2. One man’s speculation on Mr Obama’s religious belief.
  3. One might note that this “confusion” is self-inflicted
  4. Diplomacy and US relations.
  5. Have you given?
  6. On freedom.
  7. 19 years later.
  8. Culture of corruption.
  9. Stupid liberal tricks … noted.
  10. Religious freedoms?
  11. On the value of a woman.
  12. Two visions.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Science and Passion

The scientific method is taught and portrayed as a dispassionate rational dialectic between theory and experiment. Theories are propose, data is collected which forces refinement of theory and that continues. Occasionally, ala Mr Kuhn, a revolution occurs in which a major paradigm shift takes over and a radically new theory becomes ascendant. 

Alas, this has little to no relation to what actually occurs within science. Scientists are not dispassionate men judging between different competing theories analyzing experimental data to that end. They are instead emotional advocates of a particular theory which they espouse a theory which they find, well, beautiful (for a variety of reasons). Now, the reason we have success and progress in science is that the training and process of learning their particular specialty has programmed their emotional responses to align their aesthetic principles with the rigors of their discipline. 

to be continued … 

Posted in Short Thoughts, science and math.


Thursday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. We had some discussions of teachers … and pay. It doesn’t seem to me they not highly paid.
  2. More on St. Nicholas in the context of the Cordoba mosque.
  3. A car that says “I am a geek” in all caps. Or is it a nerd?
  4. A defense of theology from an outsider.
  5. A photo contest.
  6. Cold war -> Hot War?
  7. More Muslims against “the” mosque.
  8. Hockey stick and climate … and you can follow links to the original paper, in which I thought one of the unfortunate (for climate scientists) is the remark that little to no contributions have been garnered from the statistical academic community w.r.t. this matter.
  9. Have kids.
  10. To get up to speed on Austrian economics.
  11. Noting the ephemeral future of the gay population

Posted in Link Roundup.


On Ramadan

While recently I pointed to a remark that we shouldn’t believe things we hear just because we didn’t know that thing before. But … 

I heard that in Egypt during Ramadan, the month-long fast, Egyptians eat three times more than when the fast isn’t present. The explanation had to do with how Ramadan is observed. The Ramadan fast is from dawn to dusk, nothing is eaten during that time. However, after nightfall the fast is broken. And typically during the month of Ramadan people either are or entertain guests and make a feast of it. So much so that the average consumption is far greater during the fast, than afterwards.

I thought that odd. 

Posted in Short Thoughts.


Wednesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Stupid union tricks.
  2. On the Mosque kerfuffle, our President leads the way, and his leadership has an effect, commentary from an Arabic media figure,  and a representative of the left wing media response
  3. I have a question for those who offer that zoning should be blind to particularities of faith? What then of St. Nicholas (the Greek Orthodox church) which was an pre-existing church prior to 9/11 but which was damaged. The Greek diocese offered plans to rebuild the church but was rebuffed with the note that the height of their church should not be higher than the buildings planned for the Trade Center memorial. Oddly enough the plans for the Mosque in question are also higher than the buildings planned. It seems to me the left in their responses has a definite religious bias in their stance.
  4. Statistics and preschool(ers).
  5. Rockets and your toilet, two things you wouldn’t normally associate.
  6. In praise of Mr Ryan.
  7. Mr Geithner, on housing. Oddly enough what he said is just about exactly the same thing I wrote on Fan/Fred and their effect on the recession.
  8. The Fed and the failure of monetary policy.
  9. How not to do conservation.
  10. Obama and the M1 Garand.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Tuesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Radical Islam and malaria and an argument from analogy.
  2. I liked the 2nd poster.
  3. Guns from the left.
  4. And two from the right in response to Mr Obama’s twin statements on the Mosque near ground zero, here and here.
  5. Beauty and the bike-shop.
  6. Yes, that’s right “web polls” are less accurate than professional opinion polls, which for themselves are as valuable as a bucket of spit.
  7. Work and the bike.
  8. A little religious freedom comes to Turkey.
  9. Vaccinations.
  10. Talking about quantum gravity.
  11. Higher education.
  12. On Mr Hitchens.

Posted in Link Roundup.


On Opinion and Quality of Judgement

Recently I was asked my opinion on anthropogenic global warming. In the ensuing discussion, there was criticism of my rejection of “the majority opinion of ‘experts’” as a good or valid method to base my position. Having rejected that, I was asked by what means, if not the majority of experts, would I personal espouse as how to base your belief or understanding of the truth behind a matter which is in contention. In the following, first I lay out a number of different methods that people use to form opinions, next I briefly describe the two methods I try to follow.  Continued…

Posted in Christian Ethics, Christianity, Ethics.