Skip to content


Monday Highlights

Finally, links.

  1. Of multiple “validities.”
  2. For the liberals reading this, are these “two cherished axioms” accurate? And if so, what does it then mean to discuss matters with conservatives in good faith?
  3. Not unrelated .. uhm, that’s not what any conservatives I know think of liberal ideas.
  4. Alas, one of the best ways to “double exports” is kill the value of the dollar.
  5. Fannie, Freddie and the bear.
  6. On Ms Palin.
  7. Life and regret.
  8. Fasting and the Christian life.
  9. Chicago elections.
  10. One way to put it, the conflict is between rationing by the arrogant technocrats and ignorant consumers.
  11. We’ll have to see if this one has legs.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Quick Update

Links after lunch. I did ride 60 miles during the Super Bowl … and I am so very thankful that it was a good game, because the ads were not exactly compelling.

Posted in Admin, Cycling, Training.


Friday Highlights

Well, it’s good to be home. Links?

  1. Bouncing around on a mat.
  2. Humility and transformation.
  3. Outrage? Well, yes, because it wouldn’t be true.
  4. A little word play.
  5. On campaign finance, the regulations do the reverse of the intent, which is not an unusual situation I’d offer, e.g., affirmative action.
  6. Key matchups for Sunday.
  7. A questioned asked, namely “Is it true that the Inquisition was actually less likely to use torture than some secular courts of the time?” which if the answer is yes or “the same” would puncture a lot of preconceptions and stock arguments.
  8. Well, I looked but didn’t see either (a) the “filthy and inappropriate” implied joke or to be hones (b) any joke/humor at all. 
  9. Huh? Again, I don’t get it.
  10. Maybe this offers a hint as to why.
  11. If Google were government owned … 
  12. Flowers at the feet of the Virgin.
  13. Looking (back) at the Obama/Alito kerfuffle.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Thursday Highlights

Good morning … from the DAL (Love Field) airport.

  1. Advice for prayer.
  2. The seen and unseen.
  3. Fiscal policy in a nutshell.
  4. I hadn’t parsed this quote … but prompted to take a second look, why didn’t his head explode (or at least the audience break into laughter).
  5. Labor relations nominee.
  6. Well, at least somebody still has a fine sense of humor. I wonder what search terms find stuff like that.
  7. Cap and trade … one of those broken campaign promises (that would be not raising taxes on the middle and lower classes)?
  8. Speaking of taxes “fighting for jobs” by forcing companies out? Don’t worry, “blame corporate greed” will resurface soon.
  9. The elder and the pornographer.
  10. The left wing points to democrat intransigence on the healthcare matter.
  11. AIG bailout broke laws?
  12. A question on economic policy.

Posted in Link Roundup.


A Theological Puzzle.

Something to ponder, and this is from memory so I might get it a little wrong. But it’s been puzzling me.

St. Gregory Palamas asserted that the fall of man was not an ontological change but an anthropological one.

Metropolititan John Zizioulas asserts that Baptism is an ontological change.

So is Salvation ontological or anthropological?

Posted in Christian Philosophy, Christianity.


Them Evil Corporations

This morning I posted some links which I thought pointed to an essential divide between left and right. It seems likely that exactly where the left places large corporations in its pantheon where the “bad things dwell” the right puts government. Avatar is just the latest in a long list of left leaning movies which trot out, nominally or at least normally, one dimensional villains acting on behalf of or at the behest of corporate (greed) and wickedness. The movie review of Avatar I had linked notes that that movie trots out three well worn left-wing cinema stereotypes: evil corporations and their stooges, dastardly military commanders (and mindless destructive soldiers), and the good simple native peoples (borrowed I guess from some Rousseau inspired fantasy). But I am digressing a bit, what I’m trying to concentrate on is the left/corporate-as-evil and the right/government-as-evil and compare and contrast these two, for I think they play similar roles for each side. So if you’re on the left (or the right) I’m suggesting where you put corporate evil the other side puts government and vice-versa.

I was starting to write that “There are just a few things wrong with viewing corporations as compared to government in this light” and to go into a point by point fisking of the the left wing point of view why government not corporations need curtailing (and now I’ve just deleted three paragraphs of that polemic). I’m not sure “argument” is the right way to go about this. The point is just as reflexively as the right points to the evils of government, so does the left point to corporate evil. The left points to how corporate money and influence corrupts government. The right points to how government power (in the marketplace) in the first place is what attracts corporations in turn to influence government in the first place.

What I don’t see is why the left consistently looks to the source of the problem as the “evil corporations,” when I suspect few if any of them work for what they would consider the same. Nameless corporate evil … greed and whatever. The whole “evil soldier” thing is a holdover from a caricatures of what the armed forces were like in the Vietnam conflict. But what is the origin of the continuing high place of corporations, especially when compared to government, in the pantheon of “bad things?”

Posted in Christian Philosophy, Christianity, Link Roundup.


Wednesday Highlights

Well, I didn’t get up early enough to write (or post links) and slept in a bit. So … links with comments this morning.

  1. Mr Greenwald asks a question of the left. This might be were one would put a hope/change sort of dig … but I won’t go there (oops). This item will be referred to below, btw.
  2. The left takes on “corporatism” here and here, and ignores the elephant in the room. That’s right when you compare the power and ability of corporations to do ill with that of government clearly corporations are the greater evil … if of course you are severely brain damaged. How one can escape the 20th century and not realize that Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and the Khmer Rouge were all not leaders of mega-corps unleashing their corporate stooges but … wait for it … government leaders using government forces. The answer to counter corporate malfeasance is not increased government power and oversight (see item #1 above). It takes something more like, well, this. Tea parties (the original more than the latter) come to mind.
  3. A chart, which in turn demonstrates the gullibility of Democrats (and political junkies) who believe the results of about any damn poll. More seriously instead of reading tea leaves for your opinion of the other side, try getting to know some.
  4. An interesting painting.
  5. Two useful criteria when defining religion.
  6. Mr Obama does something which makes the right applaud.  Now we will have to wait for the left to figure out that means that its those evil corporations are pushing into space. Of course the right isn’t universally happy about everything Mr Obama does. But that goes without saying. Here’s something else to applaud (on the right), and it doesn’t hurt that in doing so he breaks a campaign promise.
  7. TARP and incentives. Oops. And other ways in which the administration sneaks government growth under the radar.
  8. Mr O’Keefe (consider the Ukraine link above in #2 above).
  9. On that film Avatar. Heh.
  10. 1984 and Mr Obama.
  11. A DADT compromise suggested. Comments?
  12. An Orthodox hymn.
  13. Watching economists dicker.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Of Scripture and Tradition

Recently there was a discussion over Scripture at Evangel over whether it was infallible or inerrant and what that might mean. But this discussion I offer, in an important way is missing the point. When pointing at whether or not Scripture is or is not in-whatever verses within Scripture which offer it as inspired by the Spirit of God are used to defend that point of view. Scripture is a primary tool used to understand the divine mysteries. Tradition in turn is the millennia of men and women and their progress into understanding and experiencing these mysteries.

Mystery itself is a widely misunderstood term. When we speak of mystery fiction, such as stories of the famous detectives like Ms Marple, Mr Holmes, and so on the mystery is primarily about unknown answer to the puzzle. The canonical ‘butler’ did it is not the answer to the mystery. The mystery is the experience, the unfolding and walking through toward and understanding of the occurrence in question. Telling someone that that butler “did it” does not move one towards a greater understanding of what occurred without the missing details, the context, the narrative, and the other details like means, method, and motive. These things can only be understood … and are what those protagonists strive to understand by exploring and understanding the fundamental kernel of mystery. To understand and uncover a mystery is an experiential phenomena.

Quantum mechanics is said to be a modern scientific mystery. It is one which cannot, by and large, be understood by hearing stories and words which, like ‘the butler did it’ try to describe the denouement of this 20th century physics discovery. It is understood though the experience gained by working through the mathematical details and mechanics until like the unfolding of the narrative of mystery fiction the kernel of the mystery is understood. Quantum mechanics, like those mysteries of God revealed as through a glass darkly in Scripture, is a mystery for which the core of which is ineffable.

Ineffability is not a rare thing. Most things in life in fact are ineffable. Your feelings for your wife, how to ride a bicycle, most of science (see for example Personal Knowledge), and in fact much of life is at its core ineffable. These things at their core contain central facets which are not expressible in words. They cannot be reduced fragments of language, but must be understood through the doing, or in the context of the above, are a mystery.

The arguments about fallibility vs inerrancy is one which sets aside the mystery at the core of Scripture. It is based, in part, on an assumption that reason can be utilized to unpack and expose the ineffable mystery lying behind and within the core of the key facets which Scripture contains. Trinity, duality, and creed are tools for used by our reason in seeking to understand these mystery, which in turn can only be experienced and understood not by reason alone but what in late antiquity was called our nous, which is our whole mind … including those emotive and intuitive parts of which reason is just one facet.

Liturgy and Tradition contain the wisdom of the Christian millennia of men and women who did understand the mystery trying to uncover and demonstrate for the rest of us ways to deepen our understand the mysteries within our faith. The lives of Saints, heroes of our Church, should be (and are) recounted because in their lives these men and women who did indeed understand the mysteries in ways more profound than is ordinary can be utilized as examples for us to sink into those same mysteries. Scripture gives us a fabric, a background and Tradition gives us hermeneutic, methods, and examples.

Posted in Christian Philosophy, Christianity.


Tuesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. The President and the e-Church phenomena.
  2. Nepal and the Maoists.
  3. Memory and narrative.
  4. That deficit
  5. Democracy and Islam.
  6. Big ring.
  7. Our dying democracy.
  8. Discussing the “political hit” and healthcare.
  9. Looking at strategic elements.
  10. A dam … in danger.
  11. Global warming death.
  12. Metal foam, coming to a car near you … when?
  13. Demographics and India.
  14. Hacking.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Considering Job

The “approximate” text of my homily for my OT final is below the fold. I say “approximate” because it was an oral final and unlike the rest of the class, I didn’t read from the text but used it as a rough outline and just tried to talk. The attempt at levity at the start with the Elihu/Elious quote at the beginning worked a lot better “off the cuff” than on paper.

Continued…

Posted in Christian Philosophy, Christianity.


Monday Highlights

Good morning. Well, back in Texas for the second half of the install, i.e., the physical/electrical is done and the software nominally works. Now to “go-live” and shake out the bugs and to get the users the interface the need to run the system.

  1. An old heresy.
  2. An icon made of … wooden eggs.
  3. Boundaries and life … and a wedding.
  4. Violating the principle of separation of state and church, err, sport.
  5. Regarding that show trial and Mr Holder’s due diligence.
  6. Of Obama and message (a problem in the same).
  7. Fox News derangement syndrome.
  8. I have to say I found an underlying assumption here repugnant, i.e., that every human activity should and can be taxed.
  9. Two pictures.
  10. Violence by Islamic adherents in Germany against … Polish blondes.
  11. Obama on nuclear power … words don’t match deeds. The times notes “has more support among Republicans than Democrats.” Ya think?
  12. Pro-life and pro-choice in San Francisco … as reported by a pro-choice left-leaning photo-journalist.
  13. Two questions.
  14. Polikinghorne on theodicy.
  15. Opposition to Obama … now unpatriotic.
  16. It’s cold in China.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Friday Highlights

Good morning. Well, I didn’t get up early enough to get links out yesterday, and I’m pushing it today. Last night I worked on the homily/final text. The startup is a little behind schedule … and the physical install is done, but software and controls (my part) is being shaken out … so I’ve little spare time during the day. Anyhow …

  1. As Lent approaches … a fast practised by the Chaldean/Assyrian, Ethiopian, and Coptic churches that I’d not known about … the Ninevite fast
  2. After all that … Russia is indifferent
  3. An economics paper noted.
  4. A econ question.
  5. A book noted … another here.
  6. How to teach and study ethics.
  7. The hard left and militant Islam … a match not made in heaven.
  8. The SOTU address discussed. A valid point on that here.
  9. Foolish zeal and St. Ephrem.
  10. All that spending … did what? A fat lot of nothing.
  11. Well, all the kerfuffle about Obama/Alito tells us that people need thicker skins. Heck guns have been discharged in the halls before. Now, people apparently care about “mouthing ‘no’”. Geesh. And alas, Mr Obama had it wrong factually … not that it matters. Some more remarks from the center, which oddly enough when noted here were ignored by my left leaning commenters. One more from Ms McArdle.
  12. A list which the left wants us to slip further down.

Posted in Current Events, Disengenuity, Link Roundup.


What’s This About?

Before I get to work on my homily/oral final tonight, I want to get a quick note or observation out. Recently it was observed (I think I read it somebody saw it touted by Kevin Drum) that progressives are trying to rename or redefine capitalism and free market. It seems they think that “free market” is really socialism and “capitalism” really means something like protectionism for big business and mega-corporations.

I don’t want to delve into parsing what the word “capitalism” really means, but I have no clue as to how one jumps from free-market to socialism. I thought free-markets mean minimizing barriers to entry to markets and any reducing or eliminating any restraint of trade between actors (corporations and individuals). Minimal regulation and as well minimal safety nets. That’s what free market means to me, which has nothing in common with socialism, which I associate with big government and lots of market controls.

For that matter who thinks support for capitalism means protecting big business interests?

Perhaps this has to do with this kerfuffle about Mr Obama “redefining capitalism” and some knuckle-head thought they should also re-define free-market.

Perhaps is just related to this ghastly attempt to re-write history.

Posted in Current Events, Disengenuity.


Wednesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Of Kazahkstan and Belorus … and Russia.
  2. Weirdness in the courts.
  3. Pro-life.
  4. This has been linked all over. Econ rap.
  5. Remarks on the “freeze.” Links here
  6. Mr Easterly pumping what I saw as a primary thesis of Mr Collier’s Bottom Billion book, i.e., it’s complicated and there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
  7. A pun.
  8. Rhetorical gap and policy gap.
  9. Dostoevsky.
  10. Rock the voters … should applaud the recent SCOTUS reversing (?) finally McCain/Feingold.
  11. A prediction (last sentence) … fulfilled (on blogs at least).
  12. The man with the big ego … is afraid of kids?
  13. Predictions for the SOTU.
  14. Spending and the beltway.
  15. Our economy at work.
  16. Maths thinking (use an auto translater).
  17. Is outrage.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Lent Is On Its Way

At Evangel, the Rev Paul T. McCain noted that he was somewhat unfamiliar with the details and differences of and between the Eastern Orthodox and the Western (liturgical) calendars. So, with that in mind, I thought I’d attempt to fill in what’s happening and up and coming for the liturgical year at this point. There is a personal reason for writing this, and likely I’ll bring it up again in the next few weeks, which I will get to in a bit. But first, where are we in our respective liturgical calendars? Continued…

Posted in Christianity, Link Roundup.


Tuesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Considering Vampires, an interview.
  2. Pretty.
  3. Reflections on marriage.
  4. A return to Canae.
  5. A resource for Lent.
  6. On the Conan/Leno thing.
  7. The crescent in the EU.
  8. Ice biking.
  9. Hmm.
  10. My first thought on that was that why just freeze (or cut) such a small portion of the budget. Doesn’t he realize that won’t really have much effect? This piece says that more fluently than I. It also occurred to me they could halt (and terminate) any further “stimulus” expenditures that remain to be allocated.
  11. More divisive than that other guy.
  12. A question.
  13. A beating, racially motivated?

Posted in Link Roundup.


Exegetical Reflections on Job

Well, as promised I’m going to try to talk about my upcoming oral final exam, an Old Testament homily for my late-vocations class that I’m taking. We were given the task of selecting a OT lection (reading section from the liturgical rubrics) and give an approximately 10 minute homily on that topic. I’ve selected to give a homily on Job 2:1-10, and I might note that being Orthodox we’re using the Septuagint (for that is their Scriptural canon) and the book of Job differs considerably (it’s 400 lines shorter but is longer in some places). The Job 2:1-10 reading is significantly extended in the Septuagint. Many of the changes are not very consequential. However, the final chapter differs in some surprising ways, which indeed might affect one’s interpretations of the story. Continued…

Posted in Christian Ethics, Christian Philosophy, Christianity.


Monday Highlights

Good morning. On the flight last night I finished up (on pen/paper) the background material for my Job/theodicy homily. I’ll dump a lot of it tonight in an extended essay.

  1. This is a really interesting piece, nominally on chess, but likely having lots of interesting wider implications.
  2. Adults and YA fiction.
  3. Hmm
  4. Internet and freedom.
  5. NASCAR and minority crap, err, lawsuits … not what you’d expect. But in retrospect, exactly what you’d expect from the racism implicit in the progressive movement.
  6. Politics and Mr Obama’s “going after the financial sector.”
  7. Trying to buy votes.
  8. Moving words around.
  9. PC speech crap.
  10. A book highly recommended.
  11. Handling Mr Stewart (and how).
  12. Perhaps bloggers have to fill the gap.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Friday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Hamas and Hegel.
  2. Hmm, looking (especially at the final paragraphs) at this, I think author believes that … and I don’t think it’s correct, for example I don’t think there was any possibility of “market friendly” reforms and the bill that was passed was anything but “moderate and bipartisan in everything but name.” How does someone come around to thinking that way? (a reply here)
  3. Unhappy about free speech. Here’s the salient question those M/F backers won’t answer. More here.
  4. Orwell as setting the political goals of the left.
  5. Killin’s too good for him.
  6. Hummus, although not in preparation for the upcoming Lenten fast.
  7. Giving Mr Obama his due.
  8. Germany (apparently) takes parenting seriously … even if the blogger noting it does not.
  9. Nubrella.
  10. Well, that’s very very cute.
  11. Just wrong.
  12. Prester John.
  13. Words to inspire.
  14. Post election satire.
  15. Pseudo-science.
  16. While I was originally going to try a hope/change sarcastic remark in response to this, I think this is better. If you (unlike me) assume Mr Obama is intelligent, earnest, and of high moral quality and he thinks this is the right (and ethical) thing to do … how do you figure he comes by that conclusion?

Posted in Link Roundup.


Thursday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Scotland, the Buckfast scourge (?), and monks.
  2. Islam and Christian relations in the 19th century (one example).
  3. I’ve been in the Huxley “camp” for some time, how about you?
  4. Waiting for NSS, which one expects will be more fruitful than Godot (in that it will eventually come).
  5. Tax on tax.
  6. Ant-walking alligators … a ghastly notion.
  7. Weep.
  8. Standards for girls.
  9. Sueussian rhyme.
  10. Min wage and employment (and some remarks on UI too).
  11. On a need for statemen, I think right now however left and right have a very different idea of what an ideal statesmen might be, the left looking more for a super-policy-wonk and the right for a Lincoln or Washington (a person with integrity and vision).
  12. I’ve a question for anyone who thinks this is problematic … what would be your reaction to a secular (say FSM) “Easter egg” in a similar situation.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Considering Theodicy

Theodicy is a topic I’ve been thinking about a bit. Next weekend, in the OT course I’m taking my final is to give a 10 minute homily on an Old Testament lection (assigned reading for a liturgy, matins, or vespers service). I was considering doing my little talk on a Genesis reading, because that’s the book I know the best. I’ve read a number of commentaries on Genesis (including the wonderful Kass book) and 4 or 5 separate translations, some heavily footnoted and with generous comments. But … I’ve decided instead to stretch myself and am going to talk on Job 2:1-10 … although I will likely stray to include remarks on the entire narrative of Job and the theodicy contained within that book.

Theodicy connects often as well to apologetics. Blog neighbor Larry Niven at Rust Belt (link) often looks at what he sees as failing theodicy arguments as a proof of God’s non-existence, for in his view without an answer to Theodicy God cannot exist (or be good … or at the very least worthy of worship). One of the likely failings here is that logic is not up to the task of describing everything. If he put his critical analysis of argument to work on those things to which he ascribes then likely he’d find they also fail. As Mr Plantiga remarks (in a book I have yet to read so forgive me I can’t support the details of the argument) that the argument for the existence for God fails, but it fails in a direct parallel to the argument for the existence of other minds, which also fails. We all (I’d venture) expect that other minds in the universe actually exist. Thus the failure of the (logical) argument for other minds really existing does not give us pause in our belief in them … thus that “best” (logical) argument for the existence for God failing also might not be flawed. This isn’t to say that it means that just as other minds exist so must God exist, that is the failure of the argument is no justification for non-belief if you believe other minds exist. On this subject, I’ll try to expound in the coming week.

So anyhow, during the next week I’ll likely be developing thoughts for my homily. In that regard, does anyone have any suggestions for net based resources on theodicy general and Job in particular?

I should mention that the lection noted above is read during Holy Week on Wednesday night. So besides connecting this reading to theodicy a discussion of what connection (which I think is sort of obvious) Holy Week and its events have with Job. My guess is that the obvious connection is that God’s answer to evil (and specifically bad things happening to the innocent) is the promise demonstrated by the Resurrection. But that might be just too easy an answer. I’m suspicious of easy answers.

Posted in Christian Philosophy, Christianity.


Wednesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. A payoff “matrix” for Democrats.
  2. Church and state in the EU.
  3. Church and space (in the EU?).
  4. Christians and Jews and inter-marriage … in medieval Poland.
  5. Heh.
  6. This was linked as bad sociology by me a day or so ago, here it is linked non-critically.
  7. Martyrdom.
  8. A remark from the conspiracy in the wake of the MA elections.
  9. A correlation … cause?
  10. The coming invasion … or not.
  11. Training report.

Posted in Current Events.


A Biblical Question

Here’s a quick question for Protestant readers, especially those who adhere to innerrancy and Sola Scriptura … although those of other traditions might jump in.

Look at the endings of these two books:

II Kings 25:27-30

Now it came to pass in the 37th year of the captivity of Jehoiachin king of Judah, in the 12th month, on the 27th day of the month, that Evil-Merodach king of Babylon, in the year that he began to reign, released Jehoiachin king of Judah from prison. He spoke kindly to him, and gave him a more prominent seat than those of the kings who were with him in Babylon. So Jehoiachin changed from his prison garments, and he ate bread regularly before the king all the days of his life. And as for his provisions, there was a regular ration given him by the king, a portion for each day, all the days of his life.

Jeremiah 52:31-34

Now it came to pass in the 37th year of the captivity of Jehoiachin king of Judah, in the 12th month, on the 27th day of the month, that Evil-Merodach king of Babylon, in the first year of his reign, lifted up the head of Jehoiachin king of Judah and brought him out of prison. He spoke kindly to him, and gave him a more prominent seat than those of the kings who were with him in Babylon. So Jehoiachin changed from his prison garments, and he ate bread regularly before the king all the days of his life. And as for his provisions, there was a regular ration given him by the king, a portion for each day, all the days of his life.

More than just a little similar. So … what does your tradition say about this similarity?

Posted in Christianity.


Tuesday Highlights

Good morning.

  1. Thoughts on the “super-majority.”
  2. Hunger.
  3. Actual (real-life) lawyers contending for the un-Constitutionality of the healthcare bill.
  4. Guns for God.
  5. Heresy.
  6. Podcasts on monasticism that come highly recommended.
  7. Is that right? Does the left interpret any enthusiasm on the right as “dangerous and intimidation?”
  8. Dishonest activists …. no really? (Isn’t that the norm)
  9. Hope and change continue (to fade).
  10. Demographics and Russia.
  11. If you, like me, have questions about charitable organizations like the Red Cross giving their top management big 6 figure salaries … here’s some that don’t.

Posted in Link Roundup.


Military and Budget

Recently, in the number of comment trails for which I am not quite managing to keep up, a point of disagreement arose between commenter JA and myself regarding the size of the military budget. For the purposes of the discussion below, I will concede right off that the assumptions I’m making about the opposite point of view is one which is understood by me as a stock (or not uncommon) liberal/progressive position on this matter and it may or may not coincide with JA’s particular views.

One of the current dogmas on the progressive/liberal left is that military spending is far too great. They will enjoin and welcome in today’s depressed economy any sort of broken window ala Bastiat, transposing ditches, repairing roads which don’t urgently or presently need repair, beautifying rarely used parks, or spending great sums on underused airports but if that money is spent on military resources, well now, that’s going far beyond the pale.

The current budget has four large parts which make up about 75% of the budget. These parts four parts are to a first order roughly equal. The other three parts along side the military expenditures are social security, payroll security, and healthcare. The opinions expressed here by myself regarding government/state involvement in actuarial activities and the need to be careful about keeping incentives in order are likely well known. Thus the salient objection that the military budget is too large in comparison to the other three large expenditures would normally be contested here with an eye to the point of view that the other three are not part of what a government should be engaged and therefore eliminated entirely. However, let’s set that aside and inspect for a moment the question of the size of the military budget and whether it is too large or too small. Continued…

Posted in Policy, Politics.